"Remember 2 weeks ago when you all frothed at the mouth because you thought there was a terrorist attack on the Canadian border? Yall are openly rooting for terrorism as long as it's politically expedient for you.With the new Lion King burning up the theaters (?) with it's commitment to photorealism, I thought it might be a nice time to revisit the 1994 original. One progressive account wrote, "Once all fails, revert back to fearmongering about immigration, isn't that right, Marjorie? What have or your party has done to help? Your current method of fear-mongering does a disservice to constructive political discourse and to the very constituents you claim to represent."Īnother self-identified "leftist" wrote the following: "Don’t let that stop you from fear mongering though." "You don’t know that they’re here," Helt wrote. Gail Helt, a former CIA officer and political science professor at King University, mentioned Greene's purported ignorance. ![]() While some individuals in the comments agreed with Greene, even suggesting it's not a matter of "if" but one of "when," others called her out for alleged fearmongering. "We don’t know how many, who they are, or where they are. She added without any evidence that, "With over 1.8 MILLION got aways in America, there ARE TERRORISTS HERE." "If God forbid, there is a terrorist attack in America, the Biden Administration is entirely to blame of the border!!!" Greene exclaimed.ĪLSO READ: Erotic images vanish from Marjorie Taylor Greene’s Facebook page after Raw Story questions On her congressional account, Greene posted her assessment of who would be "entirely to blame" if there was a terrorist attack on American soil. Watch the video below or click the link here. He's talked about using the Department of Homeland Security to intimidate his opponents in democratic sanctuary cities and to make sure that blue states don't get aid and red states do when there's natural disasters. He has talked about creating his own mercenary force within the community so he doesn't have to go through a chain of command that he worries would disobey him. He's talked about weaponizing the spy community, to spy on his adversaries. And those are things that aren't just forecasts of what Trump could do. "If you look anywhere in history you see the most grievous abuses of power is when the army or domestic security forces are used against a leader's political enemies. ![]() Taylor went on to say that his biggest worry is the potential weaponization of the national security community.ĪLSO READ: A neuroscientist explains how Donald Trump exploits the minds of conspiracy theorists It will be throwing the kitchen sink at American democracy and doing all the things he's wanted to do by abusing federal power." "What does Stephen Miller mean by that? He means in a second go-around, there won't be years of delay and indecision about whether to moderate Trump's position so he can win a second term. He specifically described day one to me: 'On day one, when we win, it will be a shock and awe blitz.' You have to take him at his word," Taylor said. This is how Stephen Miller, likely to be one of Trump's cabinet secretaries in a second term, described the second term to me. "Is it a stretch to imagine those things actually happening? And that this is more than his usual rhetoric?" he asked.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |